纯电动商用车动力系统优化设计及能量管理策略优化

    Optimal Design of Power System and Optimization of Energy Management Strategy for Pure Electric Commercial Vehicles

    • 摘要: 为探索不同动力系统构型对纯电动商用车经济性的影响,并为纯电动商用车系统构型设计提供工程指导,采用机理分析、仿真建模、策略优化与台架试验相结合的方法开展研究。首先从结构机理层面,对比分析三种动力系统的效率特性,基于其效率特征在MATLAB/Simulink仿真环境中搭建对应仿真模型。然后针对含两个动力源的动力系统构型,制定包含空载损耗数据库的驱动效率最优能量管理策略,并结合静态网格搜索算法绘制最优转矩分配系数网格。随后通过中国重型商用半挂牵引车行驶工况(China heavy-duty commercial vehicle test cycle for truck and trailer, CHTC-TT)、高速工况及山区工况的多工况仿真,对比各构型的经济性差异。仿真结果表明,双电机(改进型)构型经济性在各工况下表现最优,其中在CHTC-TT工况、高速工况和山区工况下,对比双电机(基本型)构型的电耗优化幅度分别为1.11%、1.16%、0.06%,优化及开发潜力最大。最后在台架上开展三种构型在CHTC-TT工况、高速工况和山区工况下的电耗试验,试验结果同样证明了双电机(改进型)构型在各个工况的电耗均为最优。

       

      Abstract: To explore the influences of different powertrain configurations on the economy of pure electric commercial vehicles and to provide engineering guidance for their system configuration design, a combined method involving mechanism analysis, simulation modeling, strategy optimization, and bench testing was adopted. From the perspective of structural mechanisms, the efficiency characteristics of three powertrain systems were compared and analyzed. Based on these characteristics, corresponding simulation models were established in the MATLAB/Simulink environment. For the powertrain configuration with two power sources, an optimal energy management strategy for driving efficiency, which incorporated a no-load loss database, was formulated. An optimal torque distribution coefficient grid was generated in combination with a static grid search algorithm. Subsequently, through multi-condition simulations under the China heavy-duty commercial vehicle test cycle for truck and trailer (CHTC-TT) driving cycle, high-speed driving cycle, and mountainous driving cycle, the economic differences among the various configurations were compared. The simulation results indicated that the dual-motor (improved) configuration exhibited the best economic performance under all conditions. Compared with the dual-motor (basic) configuration, the electricity consumption optimization rates under the CHTC-TT, high-speed, and mountainous driving cycles were 1.11%, 1.16%, and 0.06%, respectively, demonstrating the greatest optimization and development potential. Finally, electricity consumption tests for the three configurations under the CHTC-TT, high-speed, and mountainous driving cycles were conducted on the bench. The test results also confirmed that the electricity consumption of the dual-motor (improved) configuration was optimal under all conditions.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回